PDA

View Full Version : Athelas in the movie


Elf_Maven
06-19-2002, 05:37 AM
I may have missed previous discussions, but has anyone read anything about the filmmakers' choice of plant to represent athelas?

Maybe I haven't seen the movie enough times yet, but as far as I could tell, Aragorn has a little bushy herb that he tries to push into Frodo's wound, instead of boiling the leaves in water and bathing the wound. Tolkien describes Aragorn as crushing one of several 'long leaves of a plant.'

I realize that this is only one of many discrepancies, but I wondered if anyone knows what their rationale was for using a different type of plant?

Talimon
06-19-2002, 11:42 AM
I'd have no clue :).

aragil
06-19-2002, 04:20 PM
My guess is that after a lot of effort, they realized that athelas doesn't actually exist, and so they made use of a plant which actually does grow in New Zealand.

Elf_Maven
08-27-2002, 04:53 AM
Now that I have the DVD with all the features, I observe that the early filming of the scene with Arwen and Aragorn treating Frodo's wound shows Aragorn holding a large plant with several long leaves---a closer approximation to what Tolkien describes. Why did they change it? Who knows what the rationale was for using the little shrubby thing instead of the larger, individual leaves?

OK, OK, I know that athelas doesn't really exist, but with some things Peter Jackson was very diligent in trying to create consistency with the book, so why not this one?

joxy
08-28-2002, 12:35 AM
Originally posted by Maven
Now that I have the DVD with all the features, I observe that the early filming of the scene with Arwen and Aragorn treating Frodo's wound shows Aragorn holding a large plant with several long leaves

I haven't seen that- where does it appear?
The change seems to be just another of PJ's fads and fancies.

Ariana Undomiel
09-18-2002, 11:53 PM
I am not sure that it really made all that much difference. The plant certainly looked like a weed and that is exactly what it was in the book. I do think though that they could have easily made it more acurate visually to the plant described in the book.

~Ariana

Elf_Maven
09-19-2002, 02:59 AM
joxy, The plant with long leaves shows up in the featurette about Languages and also in the Fox TV special. I noticed it somewhere else too, but it's just a repeat of the same scene with Aragorn crouching down next to Arwen at Frodo's side. In the final version he has the bushy shrub with little leaves and blossoms.

Ariana, you're right, it doesn't make any REAL difference. But since I HAVE read the book, and also noticed that at one point a different plant was being used to represent the nonexistent athelas, now I'm curious about why PJ used the one he did---was there some rationale for choosing it? I'm not a botanist, so I don't recognize it, but maybe they used a plant that really does have healing properties associated with it. "Inquiring minds want to know."

joxy
09-20-2002, 06:37 PM
Originally posted by Maven
joxy, The plant with long leaves shows up in the featurette about Languages and also in the Fox TV special.
Thanks, yes, it's there in both of them, and is quite different from, and I think more appropriate than, the one that appears in the film.
Seeing the Languages feature has brought me back to those passages of invented dialogue that occasionally mar the film. It emphasises how careful they are to get the Elvish languages right, using experts and language coaches; yet they are happy, proud even, to let in bits of really horrible, anti-Tolkienian, English!

Elf_Maven
09-21-2002, 03:12 AM
heh-heh . . .

We're off the subject now, but I agree with you about the dialogue and languages. But then, it's all part of the same "picture"---in some instances they've bent over backwards to be authentic, and in others they've been too free with their adaptations (IMO).

joxy
09-21-2002, 01:21 PM
Originally posted by Maven
in some instances they've bent over backwards to be authentic, and in others they've been too free with their adaptations (IMO).
Yes, that's the pity of it: they show they CAN be good, then spoil the effect with those occasional bits that don't fit the rest of it.

Mrs. Maggott
10-21-2002, 03:37 AM
I don't know what the plant was, but it was a small, shrubby, rounded plant with small white flowers. Perhaps the plant that was shown in the "gathering scene" was the same one used in the following "treatment" scene, but instead of boiling water and scattering the leaves therein and bathing the wound, Aragorn (together with Arwen) treat Frodo who is at that point considerably worse off than he was when Aragorn treated him directly after the attack on Weathertop (he also had much smaller wound which was located in his shoulder, not his rib cage) <itb>.

At this point, Aragorn puts some of the leaves in his mouth and chews them. He then takes the macerated leaves and places them in the wound. This is an old way of treating wounds used by aborigines around the world. Chewing on the leaves breaks them down and permits them to release their curative powers into the wound. HOWEVER, whatever plant they used, they would have had to be careful that it would cause no problem for Mr. Mortensen when he put it in his mouth! I don't doubt that they gave the actor some relatively innocuous stuff like parsley rather than take the chance that he would turn green and die (thus causing a great expenditure of time and effort replacing him this far into the shooting).

From the description of the plant <itb>, it sounds like bay or some other large leafed plant rather than fennel or thyme which has smaller, finer leaves. Either way, by this time in the film, athelas was the least of their problems as far as accuracy was concerned. :rolleyes:

Elf_Maven
10-21-2002, 05:46 AM
Yes, Mrs. M, we all agree about the accuracy issue. But---wouldn't it be satisfying to know whether they actually had a valid rationale for using the plant they finally chose? And why did they start off with something different and then change it?

The DVD featurettes gave us so much behind-the-scenes information on other subjects, that I can only hope that this decision might be mentioned eventually in some of the extra material, either in the SE DVD of FOTR or in some later release related to ROTK, where athelas should make an appearance again.

Mrs. Maggott
10-21-2002, 06:56 AM
I cannot find my books right now (rachit-fratchit!), but I seem to remember that athelas has a bloom and that bloom (or its smell) <itb> enables Aragorn to find the plant south of the road in the dark after the attack at Weathertop. If my memory serves me correctly in this (and it would be a miracle if it did!), tha fact would at least explain the choice of the plant with the small white flowers.

Also, if I remember correctly (twice?!?), athelas (kingsfoil) wasn't much to look at and therefore easily "overlooked" (like Aragorn himself perhaps?), so, again, the plant chosen in the scene would fit the bill: small, not flashy but with flowers.

There must be somewhere, someplace in all the stuff written about the making of the films, that the native plant species used for athelas in that scene (and perhaps later on in the story) is mentioned. It's the sort of esoterica that most devotees thrive on and of which SOMEONE keeps a record! Unless, of course, it was a "plant" rather than a plant, if you know what I mean! :rolleyes: Sorry about that!

Ariana Undomiel
10-22-2002, 03:18 AM
Good point, Mrs. Maggott!

~Ariana