Pictures in Signatures?

[Ascamaciliel]

Could it be possible to put images in our signatures? I know if you turn on the [IMG] or html code it could work. But I was wondering if it was allowed, or if the Mods just don't want images on because it takes up too much space/time. Maybe you could set images to a certain size, and make sure no one exceeds it. Just wondering if it was a possibility.

[Khamul]

Takes up too much bandwidth I would assume, and I consider it highly annoying when everyone has sig banners, half the time I turn sigs off completely.

[Ascamaciliel]

*sigh* i suppose so...

[faila]

sig pciture wouldtn cause any bandwith problems, any site ive evr seen that hasthem, they must be linked from a thirdparty site, that way it takes no bandwith from the mb, just from whereever you got the picture.

[Talierin]

But they still would make the board slow to load, especially for dialup users, because it has to find and generate all the images.

[Wolfshead]

I would be against it, because, frankly, it would be annoying. You see a one sentence post, and then a sig which is 5 times as long. That's just pointless. And it slows download time for those of us with Dial-ups.

[Wonko The Sane]

I agree with Craig...

Other forums with sig-pix are REALLY annoying.