Well, since you guys have already had to read through each other’s long posts I won’t make you read through another one with my judging.
Both Beleg and Lhun debated wonderfully. There we no “nothing” posts. Every post had a point and delivered it clearly.
Beleg did a good job showing that Aldarion, being a king’s heir, should have been more concerned with his country rather than the Sea. He also presented well how much Erendis tried to please Aldarion to save their marriage. He backed up his arguments with fitting quotes but some times he used quotes that, well, to be blunt, meant the same things.
Lhun did an awesome job of proving that Aldarion’s actions could be justified by the times. She also presented well that Erendis either tried too little to do things or too much (like trying to change Aldarion.)
As for countering each other, I didn’t see a lot of it until the last few arguments (I won’t say posts
). But when they came, they came! The counters were very good…though I would have liked to see more countering of the counters if you get my meaning.
AS for the debate itself, it was very well organized. Each debater clearly pointed out and emphasized important bits and this is what I liked most among the other aspects of organization.
Now as for my vote…Lhun did more of a job convincing me that Erendis basically couldn’t cope with Aldarion’s ways…but Beleg proved to me more that it was Aldarion’s ways that were to blame. So Beleg, you get my vote.
Again, a great debate you guys!
Well so long honey baby, where I'm bound I can't tell
Good bye's too sweet a word baby, so I'll just say fare thee well
Bookmarks