View Poll Results: How has your opinion of the films changed through the years?

8. You may not vote on this poll
  • It remains the same

    3 37.50%
  • The films seem worse now

    2 25.00%
  • The films seem better now

    3 37.50%
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The books are timeless, but are the films aging well?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2002

    The books are timeless, but are the films aging well?

    How well are the films aging, in your opinion?

    After 10 years, would you still rate them the same?
    For to the Eldar the making of speech is the oldest of the arts and the most beloved.' - Pengolodh
    '...and Tuor met the piercing glance of his sea-grey eyes, and knew that he was of the high folk of the Noldor.'

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Wootton Major

    Re: The books are timeless, but are the films aging well?

    I watched the movies who was too young to see them when they first came out. I found that I hated the changes in the characters' actions even more than when I originally watched them. However, I imagine someone who is not as familiar with the books would probably still find the movies to be very entertaining. I think the scenery and Gollum were done incredibly well.
    'Twas brillig and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe. Lewis Carroll

    We know that in everything God works for good with those who love him, who are called according to his purpose. Romans 8:28

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    East Lansing, MI

    Re: The books are timeless, but are the films aging well?

    On the one hand, the Evil Lighthouse of Sauron annoys me now more than it did ten years ago; on the other, Faramir taking the Hobbits to Osgiliath annoys me a little less. Story changes aside, though, I recently bought the Blu-ray extended trilogy set and watching the movies in HD has given me a new appreciation for the unbelievable thoroughness with which Peter Jackson brought Middle-Earth to life.

    If anyone attempts to remake Lord of the Rings in the future, I can't imagine how they could do better than the current films in terms of visual authenticity (note that that's visual authenticity, not faithfulness to the novels). Every set, every nature shot, every costume, and every prop is damn near perfect. I can't think of a single physical thing in the movie that could look any better than it does. (I don't care whether Tolkien's Balrogs were supposed to have wings; they look great on them. )

    Of course, I could think of a few things that could be done differently... but I'm pretty happy with what we've got now to be quite honest.
    How's my driving? To make a report, click here.

Similar Threads

  1. Are the Films Superior to the Books in Any Way?
    By baragund in forum Tolkien's versus Jackson's 'LOTR'
    Replies: 175
    Last Post: 09-26-2012, 12:56 PM
  2. Films came before the books?
    By narty in forum "The Lord of the Rings"
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 04:23 PM
  3. Aging
    By Confusticated in forum "The Lord of the Rings"
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-04-2004, 07:58 PM
  4. Books, films, art, cash, and Tolkien
    By rs691919 in forum Tolkien's versus Jackson's 'LOTR'
    Replies: 151
    Last Post: 03-22-2004, 11:15 PM
  5. A Nit-Pickers Guide to Deviations Between the Books and the Films
    By bcolflesh in forum Tolkien's versus Jackson's 'LOTR'
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2004, 02:42 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts