Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: How did they make the hobbits look so small in the movie?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    US
    Age
    26
    Posts
    210

    How did they make the hobbits look so small in the movie?

    The actors aren't that short, are they? To tell you the truth, I really don't care how they did it but my mom, every time she watches the movie, she asks me how they make the hobbits look so small. And every time I have to tell her that I don't know. So, does anyone know how they made the actors who play the hobbits look so much smaller than everyone else?
    “The Sea! Alas! I have not yet beheld it. But deep in the hearts of all my kindred lies the sea-longing, which it is perilous to stir. Alas! For the gulls. No peace shall I have again under beech or under elm.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    3,176
    Originally posted by Carantalath
    So, does anyone know how they made the actors who play the hobbits look so much smaller than everyone else?
    Camera tricks, and big shoes and boxes for the big guys to stand on- and in some scenes not done very well!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    UK
    Age
    34
    Posts
    214
    hehe probably the 'biggest' actor in the film is the guy who plays Gimli...

    It's very subtle isn't it. I think they used a number of techniques; doubles, props, multiple sets of different sizes, loads of CG-trickery etc. I think there's a documentary on it on lordoftherings.net

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Nowere Special
    Age
    24
    Posts
    532
    Originally posted by joxy
    Camera tricks, and big shoes and boxes for the big guys to stand on- and in some scenes not done very well!
    There are some scenes that things look so fake!
    *Lady Arwen*
    Dimlandowen Vanya
    Aerin

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    98
    In some scenes, (like the one in the starting where they show Frodo and Gandalf) Frodo looks much shorter than in the latter scenes. The size isn't always the same all through out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Age
    26
    Posts
    127
    find out how thjey did it on nov. 12th when the extended edition comes out, for only $26.50
    nope, i dont work for new line cinemas, im just a loser

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    3,176
    Originally posted by *Lady Arwen*
    There are some scenes that things look so fake!
    and [Golden Wood] "The size isn't always the same all through out."
    Yes, they change sizes as if they're made of rubber!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Berkeley CA, USA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,349
    I thought they did the most excellent job here. Did you know John Rhys-Davies, Gimili, was the tallest actor? Over 6 ft tall. There is absolutely no way you can guess that from the movie. I guess if I really cared to nit-pick I could find some places where I "know" it's fake. But the whole point is to get sucked in, and quite frankly I have more trouble seeing Elijah Wood at normal height then I do at hobbit height . Goes to prove how good a job they did.

    They used mostly doubles and CGI, along with a few camera tricks. Some stuff was pretty simple, like having the short charachters just get down on thier knees. Other places it's just really good computer effects. For example, in the council of Elrond where the whole Fellowship is standing one next to another, it is actually a composition of two different shots. One shot has Gandalf, Legolas, Aragorn and Boromir standing there, and the other has the hobbits and Gimili. They did the second shot on a blue screen, and then super-imposed it on the original shot (which had the tall charachters). Unless you are aware of this, however, it's pretty hard to tell. The other common trick they used was to build all the sets in two sizes: real size and "hobbit" size. Contrary to what you'd think the hobbit size was actually bigger. This was done so that the size of the sets would make the hobbit charachters seem smaller.
    "We have flown the air like birds and swum the sea like fishes, but have yet to learn the simple act of walking the earth like brothers."

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    3,176
    Originally posted by Talimon
    I thought they did the most excellent job here.
    Can it be excellent for the relative heights to differ from scene to scene?
    After the Council, in the tableau that was made in two parts using the blue-screen technique, the small characters are smaller in comparison than they were during the Council, and others have pointed out scenes where the proportions were different again.
    I agree of course about Gimli in general; he certainly looks the part even though he sometimes doesn't sound or act it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Mid - Farthing
    Posts
    348
    Interesting. I get offput by some of the inconsistencies, but for the sake of the story, you set aside disbelief.
    I didn't like how, the hobbit stand-ins in long shot scenes from behind, look like 8 or 10 year old kids, but then at the end, when Frodo and Sam are standing on Emyn Muil, from the back they proportionately look like full grown men. They could easily have used stand-ins there to keep consistant.
    I also noticed, when Aragorn is letting Frodo leave and enfolds the ring in his hand, that is obviously a small child's hand. At the front of the movie, Gandalf shakes Bilbo's hand, and theirs look more of an equal size. Well, I guess they can't think of everything. I'm not really a perfectionist, and I would hate myself to have to be judged by the same standards we tend to have for PJ.

    (One funny point is, I have a Japanese friend who watched my DVD but had never heard of the books before. She really DID think the Hobbits were that small, and was surprised to see them in other pictures, like the featurettes, as normal sized. I think she thought they were like midgets or something.)
    Mindy, * * * * * ./\. * * * * *
    ~~ * * may the./sta\.rs shine * * ~~~
    ~~~on the ho./ur of o\.ur meeting~~~ JRRT

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    US
    Age
    26
    Posts
    210
    Thank you for your input in this. I like to pretend when I watch the movie that the actors really are hobbits and that size but now I can tell my mom how they do that.
    “The Sea! Alas! I have not yet beheld it. But deep in the hearts of all my kindred lies the sea-longing, which it is perilous to stir. Alas! For the gulls. No peace shall I have again under beech or under elm.”

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    not here
    Age
    27
    Posts
    162
    i saw on tv that is was mainly camera tricks and all the hobbits had short doubles. i also heard that sometimes it was the hobbits standing on there knees with the others standing on their feet. (example: in the scene when the fellowship is going up carhadras(sp) and frodo falls and aragorn helps him up. then aragorn's hands are on frodo's shoulders.
    CENTER]riddles in the dark...[/CENTER]

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Berkeley CA, USA
    Age
    28
    Posts
    1,349
    Originally posted by Confusticated
    Amusing that some people see the bad in this movie, and in wanting to think it is bad they look for bad, and fail to see the good.

    More amusing still is that some who find that amusing would like the movie enough, and think it good, so that they would fail to see the bad only because they do not want to see it.
    Difference between paying $9 to enjoy a movie and paying $9 to suffer through it. With technicalities this miniscule (and arguably controversial), only someone who is trully looking to be dissapointed will let that get in the way. When I watch a movie I try to enjoy it. I'm sorry if I can't say that for most folks.
    "We have flown the air like birds and swum the sea like fishes, but have yet to learn the simple act of walking the earth like brothers."

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,448
    Originally posted by Talimon
    Difference between paying $9 to enjoy a movie and paying $9 to suffer through it. With technicalities this miniscule (and arguably controversial), only someone who is trully looking to be dissapointed will let that get in the way. When I watch a movie I try to enjoy it. I'm sorry if I can't say that for most folks.
    I agree that it makes sense to go see a movie because you want to enjoy it. Though there are times when someone might do this for other reasons.
    I also agree that such small things should be looked past if someone wants to enjoy the movie to it's fullest extent.
    However, my point was that if someone fails to see the errors no matter how good their reason is (such as wanting to enjoy the movie) it is no different than someone who fails to see the good because they do not want to.
    The point is that sometimes people see what they want to see, defending of offending a movie they often overlook things which do not support their side of the discussion.
    For to the Eldar the making of speech is the oldest of the arts and the most beloved.' - Pengolodh
    '...and Tuor met the piercing glance of his sea-grey eyes, and knew that he was of the high folk of the Noldor.'

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ever so slightly out of sync with reality
    Age
    48
    Posts
    886
    Originally posted by Talimon

    They used mostly doubles and CGI, along with a few camera tricks. Some stuff was pretty simple
    There is an old film trick pioneered by Georges Melies known as "forced perspective" and it works very well for making things look either very small or very large. This trick is much easier to do than to explain.

    One way is to have regular size people standing net to very huge (or very small) to force the illusion, another is to have two similar sized object filmed at different distances from the camera.

    Just for fun I have included a photo of one of my favorite examples of this. These are the New York Street exhibit at the Disney Studios in Florida. The skyscrapers in the background (circled in red) look huge and far of. But in reality they are about 15 feet away and about 35 to 40 feet high.

    A better description than I can provide can be found at this link

    RD

    A time will come when a politician who has willfully made war and promoted international dissension will be as sure of the dock and much surer of the noose than a private homicide. It is not reasonable that those who gamble with men's lives should not stake their own.

    H.G. Wells

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The worst played character in FotR
    By Morgaphry in forum "The Fellowship of the Ring"
    Replies: 152
    Last Post: 12-31-2004, 08:23 PM
  2. Should they make "The Hobbit" a movie??
    By LegolasLuver in forum Tolkien's versus Jackson's 'LOTR'
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 12-10-2003, 08:51 PM
  3. My new take on the movies!
    By DMEII in forum Tolkien's versus Jackson's 'LOTR'
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-08-2003, 06:27 PM
  4. Any guesses on which movie will make more?
    By CloakedShadow in forum Bag End
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-03-2003, 05:20 AM
  5. Two points about the movie and book
    By Kris Rhodes in forum Tolkien's versus Jackson's 'LOTR'
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-26-2001, 03:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •