|
|
|||||||
| Guild of Ost-in-Edhil Behold with awe, wonder, and respect, the power and the wisdom of the Eldar. No concept is too small, no detail too frivolous. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nenya and Ancalagon - Debate
Myself and Nenya are having a debate here in the confines of Ost-in-Edhil.
The question we will be debating is; Were the Tree's 'Telperion' and 'Laurelin' the greatest creations Arda had ever witnessed? I will be debating for this statement, that they were, and Nenya against it. Nenya has the honours and will open the debate ![]() Enjoy.
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just a further point to this debate which Gothmog has raised; the discussion is centred around the creations within Arda by those who inhabit Arda, not actual creations as a direct result of the theme or Eru, eg. Elves or Men.
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#3
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
First of all I would like to thank Anc for challenging me to this debate in the first place. I am very honored by the challenge, and am very much looking forward to the experience.
Secondly, I would like to thank the Guild of Ost-in-Edhil for hosting this debate in their guild.I am taking the stance that the Trees 'Telperion' and 'Laurelin' were not the greatest creations Arda had ever witnessed. To begin: It is impossible to say that one of the many creations in Middle-earth is greater or more important than another creation. It would be folly, for each creation is a part of the whole and as such is just as equally great or important as another. A single creation in the history of Arda cannot simply be said to be the most significant creation in that history, for the history is made up of many parts; and though one part be smaller than another, all parts play different rolls in the long run to create the whole. Every part has a plan, a place, and a reason for being there. From the Sil, Of the Beginning of Days: Quote:
Quote:
Now, to look at some things about the Two Trees. From the Sil., Of the Coming of Elves: Quote:
From the Sil., Of the Sun and Moon and the Hiding of Valinor: Quote:
From the Sil., Of the Silmarils and the Unrest of the Noldor: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now, why have I shown these comparisons? For this: Telperion and Laurelin may have been two of the most magnificent of creations to look at, but they were by no means greater or more important than many other creations. I have illustrated this to show how everything, no matter how great or small, ties in together. Creations relate to each other and no creation stands on its own. It is not a single creation that should be looked at, but the whole picture of creations flowing together to create one big picture. Without the creation of the Two Trees, perhaps the Silmarills would not have been created, but without the creation of the Silmarills then the Glory of the Trees would not have been preserved. Each work relates to another which in turn relates to another or back again to the work which created it. One work cannot be said to be more important than another, for that work will undoubtedly lead on to some other work, and whether that new work be of seemingly greater or lesser importance, in the long run it is just as important as the work which started it for it helps bring about the entire picture. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hello Nenya
![]() Quote:
If I am correct in my summation of your opening statement and the general thrust of your approach, then I agree with you entirely. However, as we are actually discussing creations within Arda itself, we need to understand clearly what your interpretation of the 'whole' is in this case! Can I assume that you mean Arda itself, and the playing of time and fate within Arda, even though made up of many parts, is actually a singular event, which in turn is a 'creation?' The question is; Were the Tree's 'Telperion' and 'Laurelin' the greatest creations Arda had ever witnessed? So, when we consider the unfolding events within Arda after the actual music, we witness throughout the history a multitude of events and creations each an individual, but all part of an ever evolving history. However, from your opening statement, no matter what event or creation takes place within Arda, they are all insignificant in their own right, as only by combining them can we assume them to be great or 'whole?' Therefore, I am actually debating against you on the matter that 'time' within Arda is the greatest creation? Quote:
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
So, you could consider each creation (Telperion and Laurelin, the Nauglamir, the One Ring, the Silmarills) a piece on a gigantic chessboard. The creations which seem big, or the Queens, are very obviously significant in the chess game. However, the pawns, though in size and appearance seem less significant, are just as important as the Queens. History and Time are the game itself. Every peice on the chessboard is great in its own way, and the game would not function as well if one peice were missing. This is simply an analogy - my proof as to why each creation is as equal as another. Hope that helped!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
History and the continuation of time is made up of individual, significant and insignificant events. Not all events in history impact upon each other, as many simply happen in parallel, unless of course you desperately try to find some tenuous link, which of course is clearly how you are approaching the subject. This of course is a perfectly acceptable stance to take, especially when you consider the impact that Telperion and Laurelin had in shaping history. I can fully understand that rather than try to pinpoint another event of such historical influence, the only possible avenue left open is to try and play down this particular creations unique importance and try to circumnavigate it entirely.
If no creation or event in Arda's history is more important than another, how then can the influence of one event have such lasting reprecussions throughout an entire age or entire history? If you look at specific, individual events in Arda, it is simple to clearly see the impact of their influence in making history. Now, each certainly has its place in the whole, recorded history of Arda, yet to deny the importance of specific events and simply lump them in together is to deny the very essence of achievement and award significant events their due place in history. Of course, this is not what you are doing, you are saying that no matter how small or insignificant the event, it is just as important in the long-term as a large, significant and lasting event in the natural timeline! Quote:
Quote:
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#7
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
"Therefore, I am setting most creations on an equal plain." I included this little part in my post for the simple purpose of clearing issues such as this. You are obviously relying on the only thing that you can think of to create a hole in my theory. I was in no way considering that we were talking about such trivial things as cocktail umbrellas. I considered that it would be understood that I am talking about bigger creations than that. Also, I would like to point out that we are discussing the first ages of Middle-earth; not the 21st century in our world. Clearly if you have settled back on such a petty little thing you must be lacking any better proof. Quote:
From the Sil, Of the Sindar: Quote:
You could also take a look at the One Ring. From The Sil, Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age: Quote:
Quote:
From the Sil., Of the Silmarills: Quote:
Must I continue? There are many more things which I could refer to. You see, no matter how small a creation may seem does mean that it is insignificant or less great than any other creation. I am afraid that the only way to look at this question correctly is to look at it from this angle - any other angle is choosing to ignore the obvious. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
The simple fact remains, all things are not equal. All events have differing aspects of impact upon their environment.
You have entered this debate stating all things, no matter their origin, size or impact will eventually turn to the glory of Eru Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You seem to be shifting from pillar to post regarding the matter of the 'equal' in this instance. You quoted in response to my earlier question; Quote:
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#9
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now, I am still hungry for some proof from your side as to why Telperion and Laurlin are supposedly the greatest creations in the History of Arda. I notice that you have completely ignored and disregarded the last part of my recent post and instead have concentrated on something that deviates from your side of the debate. Would you like some more proof? Very well, I shall give it to you! From the Sil., Of Aule and Yavanna: Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Thank-you Nenya, that was an interesting read, though I am still dissatisfied with the explanation of all creations being equal. In particular, scattered throughout this debate you have constantly given examples of things you feel are either lesser, greater or equal to The Tree's, therefore I can assume, that even though all may be to the glory of Eru in the end, within Arda, all creations are not equal within Arda. Even if you believe them to be equal it is my role to prove you wrong.
However, in the end it is up to the judges to decide whether they feel some things are more equal than others and decide which is the greater of these equals. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#11
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
And thank-you, Anc, for the read as well. I am sorry that you are not satisfied with my explanation of all creations being equal, but I would like to point out that I have not scattered throughout this debate examples of things which I feel to be lesser, greater, or equal to the two trees, but have stated rather that I think it is impossible to rate the creations one above another.
I find it interesting how after so adamantly insisting that Eru does not belong in this debate you go along with my explanation of why he must be in this debate and use him in your posts. However, I think you are looking at these quotes in the wrong light:Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I fail to see your point concerning the beginning of the Count of Time making the Trees the most important creation. The Count of Time is not the beginning of Time. The trees were simply a convenient thing to start counting with. Where does importance factor in? Quote:
I see that you have still not commented on the last part of my recent posts. I can tell that you are merely concentrating on disproving my stance without a glance at those "thorns" that I am putting out. So far you have only been able to comment on things which were influenced by the Trees. What about writing? What about The One Ring? What about Dwarves? What about Weapons? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
What about Dwarves?
Dwarves, the ‘dolls’ of Aule, that do not actually impact upon the greater fate of Arda. They delve and seek fortunes, hide away from other races and rarely face the enemy that Elves and Men so readily rose against. Little dealing they had with other races, unless need forced them. They raped and plundered the earth that gave them life all to their own ends, but more importantly, these dolls of Aule were only made whole by the interjection of Eru, which means they fall into the same category as Elves or Men in this debate! Why do Orcs not qualify then if you wish to use this logic? They were a creation of Morgoth, an abomination, but still in their own sickening way a creation. What about Dragons, do they qualify also? Because even if they do, they did not compare to the Trees and their great, lasting impact upon Arda and its fate. What about Weapons? Weapons are but a tool for the masses, no more than fists or feet, but an extension of an individual’s ability to do evil against another! A fork or a stick is just as deadly as a sword if you really need a comparison. But the fact remains, the will behind the need to use a weapon is more important than the weapon itself. What about Writing? Quote:
Quote:
What about memory, the stories passed down through families by word of mouth? Eru gifted Men and Elves with a memory, is that not a powerful tool in itself? It is only in recent times that business transactions were subject to written agreements. A practised skill of bartering, discussing and finally the clasp of hands was a potent force in dealings in trade. 'A Man's word is his bond' was not a lightly forsaken agreement, especially when you consider how many in the Arda would have been totally illiterate. This does not mean they were ignorant, just the fact they had no need of letters to achieve a goal. Truth is, letters only record what Man or Elf does, so we know a history through record, but in truth, we also have a history through word of mouth, and both are subject to elaborations and twists, so are we any better off? The Ring? The trinket of Morgoths lieutenant? All it was an item of Gold that held the will of Sauron. It was but an extension of the Dark Lord himself. So, in reality the Ring is nothing more than the will of Sauron, a small device that would have been more potent, had he not managed to lose it in the first place. Remember, Sauron is still a powerful force on his own, even without the Ring, yet the Ring itself was a weakness that haunted him when beyond his reach. The effects of the Ring do not live on, even in its passing. Nor did it signify the passing of Elves from Middle-Earth, for it is well understood the Rising of the Sun signalled their end, even as the Atani awoke. The Ring itself made little impact upon Arda as a whole, for life went on, even through the long years it was lost. Sauron was the problem; the Ring was his 'Achilles Heel' if you like, for when it was lost, his weaknesses were laid bare. Once he was gone and the Ring destroyed, what was left for us to wonder that this was a great creation? Compare all these to the Count of Time. The Stars in the night sky that awoke the Firstborn, The Silmarils that shaped the History of the Noldor and the Houses of Men that gave them their allegiance, which led to the Downfall of the Greatest of Eru's creations. The Sun rising every day, even as it did to beckon the arrival of the Secondborn, as it still does across this mythological land. The Moon should we forget, that lights a path for the traveller at night and give hope to all who looked upon it in their darkest hours. The Trees, those creations that lit Valinor for the longest age and were fated to touch the lives of every soul in Arda, now and still continue to do so with every Sunrise and Sunset. What is great about them is the fact that they do not have an equal in the grand scheme, for they are unique, inspirational and fantastic, more than any other creation Arda has ever yet seen. They are the Sun, the Moon and the Stars.
__________________
'Tis virtue, and not birth, that makes us noble; Great actions speak great minds, and as such should govern. - John Fletcher, The Prophetess Threads you should make a point of reading! |
|
#13
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
To continue on the Dwarves:
Unfinished Tales: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Dwarves are a perfectly fine example to use as a creation on my part. Aule created them. All Eru did was give them wills of their own so that they could be seperate from their creator. If we counted everything in the History of Arda which came from Eru's devine intervention, we would not have much to work with. Why have I chosen to use only Dwarves? Ents are a shady issue, Dragons I have my own thoughts of their origin, and Orcs? It would not be possible for me to use Orcs as Orcs are not a creation of their own - they are merely twisted Elves: The Sil: Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Sil: Quote:
The Sil: Quote:
The Fellowship of the Ring: Quote:
Writing is also a means for sending messages over long distances during battle and war, a way of putting down one's thoughts, a way of preserving song, and a way of remembering history and learning from it. Where would we be without history? What if writing had not been created in our world? What would our pasts have looked like? We would be lost. The Fellowship of the Ring: Quote:
Quote:
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|