🧙 The Tolkien Forum 🧝

Welcome to our forum! Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox! Plus you won't see ads ;)

Christopher Tolkien's take on Peter Jackson's movies

Gilgaearel

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
66
Reaction score
29
Location
London
By the time that his father sold the rights of these two books there was nothing that Christopher Tolkien could do to change how the studios would use the stories that they bought.
I don't think though, and the article doesn't say, that Tolkien sold all the different kinds of copyright. The intellectual property right for instance can't be sold as far as I know, so the book and the story will always have to be attributed to J.R.R. Tolkien and that is the reason why the studio and the production company were forced to pay the 7.5% of their profits. Because they had to use the name of the original author as otherwise they wouldn't be able to sell the movies.

According to wikipedia now just the LOTR films brought to the production company $2,917,506,956. The 7.5% of these ( without the merchandising and all else) is 216,705,521. The Hobbit series brought similar profits to the company so the Tolkien Estate probably got another 200+ millions from the other three movies without calculating again the same percentage on the profits from the merchandising and whatever else they sold.

I assume that the Tolkien Estate wouldn't sell the rights of LOTR and The Hobbit books, but on the other hand the amount of money it got was close to the amount of money that J.K Rowling got for the Harry Potter movies. So I think that the arrangement turned out fine for Tolkien's Estate and in expanse for the Tolkien family and though Christopher Tolkien isn't a fan of the movies he has no reason to complain any more for the decisions of his father.
 

Gothmog

Lord of Balrogs
Staff member
Joined
Sep 10, 2001
Messages
1,953
Reaction score
142
Location
Cardiff, United Kingdom
But Christopher Tolkien was not complaining for the decisions of his father but, like many of us, for the decisions of Jackson and the studio. J.R.R.T. knew that the LoTR could not be put on film with out changes. One in particular was Tom Bombadil who he thought should be left out entirely including all of Tom's dialog. Tolkien's view was that if a character was removed from the story then all dialog from that character should likewise be removed and not put in someone else's mouth where it would have a different meaning.
 

Squint-eyed Southerner

Skulking near Archet
Joined
Apr 9, 2018
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
1,156
Location
Virginia, USA
Yes indeed, and as he made clear in his comments on Z's treatment, what he feared most was not abridgement, but compression, along with anticipation, both of which PJ was guilty of, beginning with the Prologue. The slow unfolding of a series of mysteries (I should say "riddles") in the books was flattened and lost, due to PJ's distrust of his audience.

Well, that, or incompetence.
 
Last edited:

Valandil

High King at Annuminas
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
463
Reaction score
60
Location
Casper, WY
DID the Tolkien Estate benefit financially from the movies? I thought they "showed no profit" in good Hollywood style.
 

Valandil

High King at Annuminas
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
463
Reaction score
60
Location
Casper, WY

Elaini

Lost in Eä
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Messages
113
Reaction score
94
Location
Finland
Though in the case of Lotr movie trilogy there was no way to claim it as a flop by New Line Cinema. Still they held the promised payments from the people they were promised to.

And I take that intergrating NLC back into Warner Brothers was a proof that their accounting was done very poorly. And during the time of The Hobbit the movie makers were again more clearly in the leash of Hollywood.
 

Olorgando

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Messages
568
Reaction score
264
Location
Germany
According to wikipedia now just the LOTR films brought to the production company $2,917,506,956. The 7.5% of these ( without the merchandising and all else) is 216,705,521. The Hobbit series brought similar profits to the company so the Tolkien Estate probably got another 200+ millions from the other three movies without calculating again the same percentage on the profits from the merchandising and whatever else they sold.
As Wikipedia just enlightened me (to my total astonishment), that 7.5% actually is "of the gross from any films based on his works". The film industry (and perhaps some related ones) certainly march to the beat of different drummers from the run-of-the-mill economy (including multinani0onal companies). :eek: Stuff gets distributed from net profits, mostly.
 
Last edited:

Thread suggestions

Top